Middle-East turnaround of Reynolds/Hefty/Diamond brand: Vincent was the Lead Strategist and Architect in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the greater Middle East in a multi-year business transformation program in the consumer-packaged goods space to reset the Enterprise Architecture for the region. The highly recognized Diamond products were no longer contributing consistent revenues across the Middle East (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait, Qatar, and Jordan) and the product line was experiencing declining sales.
APPROACH
VALUE DELIVERED
Designed of a new Enterprise Architecture and integration for the $1b enterprise of Dentsu Network West responsible for 20 offices in 8 countries with 1,100 employees throughout North American, Latin American and Europe (U.S., Canada, Argentina, Brazil, Belgium, Italy, UK, Germany).
Design and Implementation of Oracle Peoplesoft ERP System for this ad group headquartered in New York NY with 35 offices in North America. Led the Oracle Peoplesoft implementation for this 2,800 employee user group across multiple business processes in Advertising, Digital, Direct Marketing, e-mail Marketing, PR, Data and Mobile. Responsible for build and rollout across all modules (Projects/Contracts Management, Estimates, Billing, AR, AP, PO, GL, Time, Expenses, Reporting, Workflow, HR, Business/Data Warehouse).
Designed the strategy for the Ministry of Health in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to complete an audit of 200+ hospitals for incident rate success, while collecting data and designing a country wide value based healthcare system supported by that data analysis.
The Ministry of Health (MoH) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) has identified the need to drive better healthcare outcomes through a renewed focus on smart and impactful healthcare regulatory policy. To achieve this ambition and realize the objectives of the Vision 2030 Health Sector Transformation, the MoH needed to build a best-in-class value-based healthcare (VBH) system, bolstered by streamlined clinical audit practices and meaningful data-driven care. The MoH policy decisions will bring greater alignment for healthcare initiatives as they relate to key objectives of KSA’s Vision 2030 Strategic Plan, and ultimately enhance the quality of life of citizens in the Kingdom.
These three foundational components in the strategy were:
ASSESSING & REDESIGNING THE CLINICAL AUDIT PROGRAM
The pilot design was set to evaluate and enhance the clinical audit function at 10 hospitals, focusing on capabilities, processes, and technology for three chosen diagnoses (Stroke, Sepsis, Post-Partum Haemorrhage). The strategy was designed to develop a scalable, robust audit program, including training for hospital teams and expanding to 21 MoH hospitals. The data from this wider plan lays the groundwork for a future clinical audit system and a value-based healthcare approach.
ASSESSING & REDESIGNING THE APPROACH TO CLINICAL DATA
Accurate and trustworthy data is needed to make a clinical audit and Value Based Healthcare (VBH) meet the high standards set for this project. The strategy was designed to assess the MoH’s clinical data landscape and identify improvements necessary to support the redesigned clinical audit program and VBH system with a focus on complete, consistent, and accurate data.
ASSESSING & BUILDING A FOUNDATION FOR VALUE-BASED HEALTHCARE (VBH) SYSTEM
Working with baseline data gathered on MoH current care delivery practices, preventative care measures, and patient experience, along with the clinical audit data from the three (3) chosen diagnoses, the strategy was designed for the MoH to assess its ability to implement a Value-Based Healthcare system and build an engine for continuous improvement of clinical outcomes.
DELIVERABLES
OUTCOMES
Designed the Integration Strategy for Wilton and Chicago based advertising firm through 4 acquisitions (Forbes Dallas, RMG Richmond Data, RMG Toronto, NRS Danbury) and 3 office openings (San Francisco, New York, Durham)
The main objective for KAFD was to establish a new department – the IT Project Management Office (IT PMO) – to bring project management rigor to the organization. KAFD wanted to use comprehensive and effective project management methods and tools to manage the entire lifecycle of projects, including establishing the hybrid project management office within the corporate department for project management. The aim was to reimagine an IT PMO to enhance efficiency, improve the level of governance, and comply with project management best practices. The Office was intended to support KAFD through key management activities including effective project management, enhanced reporting, unified processes, improved quality assurance, and capability development of KAFD’s departments and work teams to help them manage their projects for optimized outcomes.
GOALS
APPROACH
Designed a structured four-phase approach where Phases 1 and 2 are centered on understanding current state, then setting up the IT PMO to succeed. Phase 3 was centered on project delivery and Phase 4 was centered on improving capability and transitioning knowledge to KAFD. We recommended running Phases 3 and 4 in parallel so that while the plan is executed, we were also continuously improving IT PMO caliber, for example by acting on performance indicators and learning lessons.
PHASE: Initial Assessment
PRELIMINARY TIME FRAME: Week 1-4
TASK: Kick-off meeting & Initial Review
OBJECTIVE: Understand current state and expectations
DELIVERABLES: Initial report on current state and resource capacity
MEASURES OF SUCCESS: Clear understanding of current state and gaps; Initial report on resource capacity
PHASE: Framework Enhancement
PRELIMINARY TIME FRAME: Week 3-10
TASK: Enhance IT PMO project framework & Define KPIs
OBJECTIVE: Align IT PMO framework with KAFD's goals
DELIVERABLES: Comprehensive IT PMO framework; Acceptance criteria and KPIs
MEASURES OF SUCCESS: Comprehensive IT PMO framework; Clearly defined KPIs
PHASE: Handbook Development
PRELIMINARY TIME FRAME: Week 5-10
TASK: Review & Enhance IT PMO handbook
OBJECTIVE: Develop a comprehensive guide for IT projects
DELIVERABLES: Enhanced IT PMO handbook
MEASURES OF SUCCESS: Comprehensive IT PMO handbook for all IT projects
PHASE: Resource Assessment
PRELIMINARY TIME FRAME: Week 7-10
TASK: Assess resources & Submit recommendations
OBJECTIVE: Optimize resource allocation
DELIVERABLES: Detailed resource assessment report
MEASURES OF SUCCESS: Detailed report with recommendations
PHASE: Reporting & Data Capture
PRELIMINARY TIME FRAME: Week 5-12
TASK: Define report structure & Develop templates
OBJECTIVE: Establish reporting standards
DELIVERABLES: Reporting standards; Initial report templates & dashboards
MEASURES OF SUCCESS: Established reporting standards; Initial templates
PHASE: Portfolio & Governance Enhancement
PRELIMINARY TIME FRAME: Week 9-10
TASK: Review & Enhance IT Portfolio and Governance
OBJECTIVE: Improve IT Portfolio framework and governance processes
DELIVERABLES: Improved IT Portfolio framework; Enhanced governance processes
MEASURES OF SUCCESS: Improved IT Portfolio framework; Enhanced governance processes
PHASE: Implementation Monitoring
PRELIMINARY TIME FRAME: Week 11+
TASK: Monitor IT Governance implementation
OBJECTIVE: Ensure adherence to governance processes
DELIVERABLES: Feedback report on governance implementation
MEASURES OF SUCCESS: Successful implementation of IT Governance processes
PHASE: Finalizing Reporting Tools
PRELIMINARY TIME FRAME: Week 12-14
TASK: Update report templates & dashboards
OBJECTIVE: Finalize reporting tools based on feedback
DELIVERABLES: Final report templates & dashboards
MEASURES OF SUCCESS: Finalized and approved templates & dashboards
PHASE: Training & Workshops
PRELIMINARY TIME FRAME: Week 10-14
TASK: Organize training sessions & workshops
OBJECTIVE: Enhance staff skills in project management and IT Governance
DELIVERABLES: Training sessions & workshop materials
MEASURES OF SUCCESS: Successful training sessions; Positive feedback from participants
PHASE: Review & Approval
PRELIMINARY TIME FRAME: Week 14
TASK: Review all work & Seek KAFD-IT approval
OBJECTIVE: Ensure all deliverables meet KAFD-IT standards
DELIVERABLES: Approval documentation
MEASURES OF SUCCESS: All deliverables approved by KAFD-IT
Led Project Design and Implementation of SAP ERP System for this ad group headquartered in Wilton CT with 9 offices in North America. Led the SAP implementation for this 1,300 employee user group across multiple business processes in Advertising, Digital, Direct Marketing, e-mail Marketing, Data and Mobile. Directed all operations, maintained operational budget and was Strategic Lead in developing processes for inter-company collaboration. Responsible for Worldwide IT Budget/Strategy for SAP build and rollout across all modules (Projects/Contracts Management, Estimates, Billing, AR, AP, PO, GL, Time, Expenses, Reporting, Workflow, Assets, HR, Business/Data Warehouse).
Designed and built reporting standards, application development and implementation, as well as the training strategy and process of a Business Intelligence Datawarehouse to measure profitability, utilization, forecasting, compensation trends, revenue and expenses in accordance with GAAP
Vincent joined the board at Magnetic 3D to write a business plan for a $3m capital raise to build a technology driven strategic experiential agency. He focused on creating meaningful customer engagements with hyper-measurable results. Upon the successful capital raise, Vincent became the CMO/President of Magnetic 3D while pioneering measurable technologies; No-Glasses 3D Video, Mobile Proximity Marketing and VR/AR technologies. Vincent wrote the business plan and operating model including building financial projections for 5 years and writing/designing the marketing plan, including advertising messaging and competitive analysis.
Designed the RFP process for building the Strategic Plan for the Dubai Petroleum Electronic Documents, Records Management, and Information Management System. Dubai Petroleum (“DPE”) maintained multiple systems through which unstructured content (documents, records) was managed throughout its lifecycle, including network shared drives, Livelink and SharePoint. However, providing and maintaining a varied landscape of tools, accompanying processes, and unified approach to both architecture and management of these systems was challenging, expensive, and inefficient:
• Duplication of documents/records across multiple systems led to waste in both capital and time – maintaining unnecessary, multiple copies of content requires expensive infrastructure (hardware/software/supporting services), as well as software licensing. Additionally, duplication creates “noise” which can overwhelm search indexes and a user’s overall ability to find and use/re-use correct documents and records.
• Multiple systems, no single version of the truth – without a definitive model of content versioning and maintenance; there is inconsistent retention, classification, and collaboration, resulting in multiple copies of a versioned document, which led to confusion regarding the most current, correct document.
Defined the Objectives and Approach for the Engagement
A. Vendor needs to work with DPE’s Information Management (“IM”) resources to assess, recommend, and develop an Information Architecture Framework that is attainable, sustainable, and delivers value to its DPE corporate users.
B. To provide a clear path from review of current state, design of information architecture that is fit-for-purpose to the O&G sector, procedural improvements, competency assessment and development, and a go-forward strategy for enterprise implementation of the same.
C. The intent of this work is to provide clear and direct action for change based on specific gaps identified. This may be identified through limitations in system functionality and / or an absence of structure to Records and Information Management.
D. Vendor’s Professional Services to provide a comprehensive and tailored approach to information governance.
E. Defining and developing an actionable plan for DPE to deploy a future state Information Architecture model through which regulatory compliance requirements might be met (i.e., records retention), as well as international standards and associated controls which have been adopted by DPE (e.g., ISO 27001)
F. Maintaining alignment with both DPE’s enterprise architecture and technology roadmap for business productivity tools.
G. Develop a strategy to help DPE Maximize the best use of current Client implementations of Microsoft Teams, SharePoint One Drive and Livelink for working and sharing documents.
Defined the Description of the Deliverables:
The following described the deliverables for the Electronic Document and Records and Information Management Solutions (“Solution”) and Related Services Deliverables.
1. Information Management Model
The Vendor should provide their Information Management Model that shows a cohesive approach to organizational alignment around change management, data governance and document / content management. Their comprehensive framework should consist of both quantitative and qualitative analysis for solving transformation problems through a clearly defined roadmap of measurable phased steps and checkpoints.
2. Experience and Credentials
The Vendor should supply 3 business case studies of document and/or information management solutions supported by the implemented phased approach and the value driven results achieved by the Client.
3. Discovery
Discovery assessment of Existing Records, Systems, and Policies and Procedures shall include discovery assessment sessions in order to develop a detailed assessment and strategic roadmap for a comprehensive Records Management Program.
Vendor shall provide the strategy and design of a Solution and Related Services for;
a) Electronic Document and Records Management System(s)
b) Information Management System(s)
c) Professional Services for managing above Systems
Vendor shall perform the following tasks including but not limited to;
i. Conduct a data-led assessment of the use and management of DPE’s unstructured content stores, including (but not limited to) networked shared drives.
ii. Determine the current state of DPE’s Information Architecture throughout the enterprise and recommend an IM framework.
iii. Recommend an architectural model for unstructured content storage that takes into consideration currently licensed solutions, as well as operational conditions.
iv. Define the requirements and roadmap for use of systems to manage records.
v. On-site assessment/discovery interview sessions, with teams from participating Client’s departments/divisions.
vi. Assess current records requirements by the participating departments/divisions and types of records generated (e.g., data, documents, messages, etc.)
vii. Assess current systems utilization for stored records for both current and legacy documents.
viii. Assess current taxonomy and metadata implementation.
ix. Evaluation of adherence to the current Retention Schedule/Record Destruction Policy.
Defined the Strategic Recommendations:
Using the combined quantification from data analytics obtained from internal discussions with DPE resources, vendor to provide strategic recommendations for;
i. How the existing systems might be developed or improved through best practices to improve the immediate situation and provide a bridge to future improvements. This may include introduction of specific naming conventions, standardization, and/or simplifying naming conventions.
ii. Ways to restructure shared drive folders to better align to best practice and international standards (e.g., a file plan that represents the Functions, Activities and Transactions of each business to increase findability and disposal management).
iii. New systems (where appropriate) or enhancements to existing systems that could enable the reduction of documents and records, minimising over retention and duplication, and implementing best practices for archiving.
iv. Updating the operating model for information management to introduce accountability across the organisation, assess and develop IM-related skills, and meaningful ways to measure improvement.
v. Definition of consistent standards for go-forward state.
Defined the Deliverables for Document Management/Records Management Functionalities
Vendor shall provide the strategy and design of a future state Solution, and support to implement;
i. Records Management: Strategic design concept of an improved centralized repository of records to include; classification(s), tracking, and version control.
ii. Records Retention Management: Strategy for a Solution design for the policy for the Client’s records retention management, controls, functions and responsibilities for retaining such records.
iii. Records Classification – Taxonomy: Best practices Solution design concept that supports the Client’s classification system, naming conventions and metadata.
Search Capabilities (Search, Retrieve and View): Best practices Solution design concept that supports the Client’s search requirements and permissions / security needs around such functionality.
iv. Reporting and Management: Best practices Solution design concept that supports the Client’s reporting requirements around document management.
Defined the Professional Services Needs for Business Processes and Workflow
Consulting Related Services to Client(s) in the planning stages of implementation of the revised Solution with the following deliverables;
i. Current State Cleanup: Provide an assessment for an audit and cleanup of current document and information records.
ii. Retention Schedules: Conduct a review of current classification systems and retention schedules and make recommendations for improvements.
iii. Key Stakeholder Alignment: Provide assessment / evaluations and recommendations for alignment with Client’s identified engagement team.
iv. Business Transformation: Provide recommendations for change management, and other ongoing program management activities to correct the current state document management and information management issues.
v. Policies and Procedures: Provide general guidance on executing strategies for successful adoption of new policies, processes and procedures.
vi. Roles and Responsibilities: Provide guidance for the required roles and responsibilities required to fulfill a sustainable approach to acceptable documents and information management.
Provide a Solution design that can automate and streamline workflows and/or processes for the Client to create and add records into the Solution from various sources and formats using various methods;
a) Email messages and attachments
b) Network shared drives
c) Microsoft Office applications
d) Other File Servers
• Combining DPE’s scan and analysis of its Livelink content store(s) and network drives and other operational record store(s) (e.g., SharePoint, Teams, network drives) – a cohesive taxonomy and recommended file structure for DPE’s records landscape shall be produced, balancing both DPE’s legacy structures and O&G industry best practices.
Defined Needs of Commercials Requirements:
Vendor to provide man days and lumpsum cost. Vendor to provide a Work Plan/Timeline with estimated days/hours required to complete the Discovery/Assessment of Existing Records, Systems, and Procedures to complete all components of this Engagement. Vendors should submit their price proposal to include pricing for all services identified in the proposal. If any components of the vendor proposal are “optional” and not included in the summary or total price, those features must be clearly labeled as “optional” in the vendor proposal. All “optional” items not included in the total price must identify a price separately.
i. Vendors must submit costs as fully loaded rates that include all necessary travel (or list travel as a fixed or not-to-exceed amount) that is anticipated to complete the full Engagement.
ii. Cost Schedules being proposed are to include all components and services necessary to meet the requirements of this RFP.
iii. Costs not identified cannot be added or considered at a later time and will not be accepted in the final contract.
iv. All pricing is exclusive of relevant taxes and tariffs.
v. Note any exceptions to the RFP terms and conditions.